Hello,

I am not very convinced about the utility of this proposal. Also, I think that the current specification could use more details about how the system should work. I wrote a comment on the pull-request thread with more details.

-Iavor

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:

Hi,

this is your secretary speaking:

https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/27
was brought before the committee. I propose Richard as the Shepherd.

Richard, please reach consensus as described in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out
debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with
you.

Greetings,
Joachim

--
Joachim Breitner
mail@joachim-breitner.de
http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee