Hello,

Proposal #281 has been submitted for review by the committee again, please read through it and let's have a discussion.   Here are links to the proposal's discussion section, and the proposal text:

While I suggested acceptance on the previous version, I am leaning towards rejecting the proposal  now.  My reasoning is that I hadn't fully understood all the aspects of the original proposal, and the new proposal seems to lack a simple modular specification.  There are *many* changes described in the document,  but I found it hard to understand what is the current design, from the point of view of a user of the feature, as opposed to someone trying to implement it.

I'd be curious about what others think.

-Iavor