hey all, <div>It seems to me (and i&#39;ve certainly heard other people echo this sentiment) that: ghc dev chatting gets buried in the huge volume of commit + build report emails, and that creates (perhaps) another barrier to involvement in ghc dev at the hobbyist (rather than part time/full time ) scale?</div>

<div><br></div><div>So my question for the community (and of course current ghc devs )</div><div><br></div><div>1) do others agree that theres value in separating the two? </div><div><br></div><div>2) would this just be another use  of the ghc-users list or would it be worth having a ghc-dev list?</div>

<div><br></div><div>3) most importantly, would the folks actively involved in ghc dev be willing/able to  do so?</div><div><br></div><div>That said, it does seem like the majority of the interesting ghc-dev chatter is on Trac issues, which is a good thing, though theres lots of interesting wee nuggets buried on the ghc-cvs list intermittently</div>

<div><br></div><div>I hope this question makes sense for y&#39;all!</div><div>-Carter</div>