Hi Bulat,

My contribution to the survey: I've used forkProcess to daemonize
a ghc program inside the haskell fuse bindings:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/HFuse
http://code.haskell.org/hfuse/System/Fuse.hsc

If removing the non-threaded RTS would break forkProcess entirely,
these bindings would have to do something different. The issue: users
of the FUSE C api will get daemonized using daemon(2); it'd be
nice if GHC fuse programs could behave similarly.

Thanks,
Brian Bloniarz

> Hello Tomasz,
>
> Saturday, December 6, 2008, 10:52:39 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Had you deprecated the non-threaded RTS, we would probably have no problems
> > described in ticket #2848 :-/
>
> > I think you'll have to deprecate it anyway, because it will be more
> > and more difficult
> > to maintain two versions of code, especially if one of them will be
> > much less used and
> > tested.
>
> we may conduct small survey on amount of usage of old RTS (i mean ask
> this in haskell-cafe)
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

---

Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger  Get it now!