On Jul 16, 2009, at 03:32 , Johan Tibell wrote:
2009/7/16 Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>
> I have a standalone (i.e. not integrated into the RTS yet) proof of concept
> working using kqueue. However, to be portable we still need to fall back to
> select on systems that don't support anything better. This implies that if you
> want to write portable code you still suffer from this limit.

If portability is important, how about falling back to poll(), not
epoll()?

We could provide poll as a possible backend but I don't think it's available on Windows.

http://plibc.sourceforge.net/ ?

-- 
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery@kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university    KF8NH