What about literate files? the inclusion of extended haskell files expand to too much file extension in my opinion.<br><br>*.hs<br>*.lhs<br>*.ehs<br>*.elhs<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 20, 2007 10:15 PM, Alex Jacobson &lt;
<a href="mailto:alex@alexjacobson.com">alex@alexjacobson.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">.ehs stands for extended haskell and encapsulates the 90% case of people
<br>just wanting -fglasgow-exts with a minimum of fuss.<br><br>Having a filetype seesm better than the alternatives of either adding<br>boilerplate language/options pragmas to the top of your source files or<br>putting them in a cabal file.
<br><br>-Alex-<br>_______________________________________________<br>Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org">Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org</a><br><a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users" target="_blank">
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Luis Cabellos, <br><br><a href="http://malcodigo.blogspot.com">http://malcodigo.blogspot.com</a><br><br>