Yes, thanks Sean for helping clarify! 
yes, The TypeLits Nat

I had a discussion on the list with Iavor and others a few months back 
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2012-August/022789.html

and there were some examples and dialogue beyond that with Iavor and SPJ, but it was off list. 

point being: for Word or Int sized instances of Nat singleton, theres a number of interesting ways having that information used to statically specialize a numerical computation with some constants is handy, and last time I asked it sounded like the story for this wasn't fully worked out.

I hope I'm explaining clearly, if not I'll be happy to try to elaborate further

-Carter




On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Sean Leather <leather@cs.uu.nl> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:34:29PM -0500, Carter Schonwald wrote:
> A related question I have is that I've some code that will map the
> singleton Nats to Ints, and last time I looked into this/ had a chat on the
> ghc-users list, it sounded like sometimes having Integer values constructed
> in between are unavoidable.  Is that still the case with post 7.6.1 ghc?
> (And or, how might I be able to help?)

I don't know what a singleton Nat is, but if you mean Word then that's
what Johan's been working on.

I'm guessing Carter means Sing Nat:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base-4.6.0.0/src/GHC-TypeLits.html

Regards,
Sean

_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users