This has the problem that kind is currently a valid function name, so it would take a new keyword, or at least on conditional on the DataKinds extension.<div><br></div><div>-Edward<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Erik Hesselink <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:hesselink@gmail.com" target="_blank">hesselink@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">
<div>When we discussed this last time (summarized by the link Pedro sent, I think) it came up that it might be nice to also<br>
</div>
<div>have kind synonyms, which would be analogous to type synonyms, but one level up.   The &quot;natural&quot; syntax for that would be to have a &quot;type kind&quot; declaration, but this seems a bit confusing...</div>

<div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div> What about just &#39;kind&#39;? It&#39;s symmetric with &#39;type&#39;. </div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Erik<span></span></div>

</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org">Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>