Should we recommend that all library developers compile their libraries with a max heap of 4G (to pick an arbitrary number) so that we can catch some of these issues earlier?On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Paolino <paolo.veronelli@gmail.com> wrote:Hello, I'm using ghc 7.10.1 to compile OpenGLRaw which is now impossible with -O1 and -O2 due to "ghc : out of memory error" on a 4GB linux host. The file making memory explode is Graphics.Rendering.OpenGL.Raw.Functions. With -O0 it uses 600 MB.The file is really huge, but I could compile it with prior versions of ghc.Regardspaolino2015-04-17 1:33 GMT+02:00 David Laing <dave.laing.80@gmail.com>:DaveHi all,I've been playing around with profiling GHC recently, so I thought I'd chime in with a pointer that might save people searching for the right docs - you could configure a cabal sandbox to work with multiple version of ghc, which I've found useful:
https://www.haskell.org/cabal/users-guide/installing-packages.html#sandboxes-advanced-usage
Cheers,On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Michal Terepeta <michal.terepeta@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Richard,
Thanks updating the ticket! What I did was: build GHC HEAD/7.8.4 with build flavor 'prof' then get the haskell-src-exts sources, install the dependencies and finally add +RTS -p -RTS to the cabal file and compile it, the resulting ghc.prof contains the profiling information.For anyone interested about CallArity slowness, the problem is tracked in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10293Cheers,MichalOn Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:40 AM Richard Eisenberg <eir@cis.upenn.edu> wrote:I've pasted Michal's numbers in #9630, which seems like a good place to track this. Michal, would you mind fleshing out a bit precisely what you did to get those numbers? That would be helpful (though you've already been very helpful indeed in getting the data together)!
Thanks,
Richard
On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:09 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 14.04.2015, 21:54 +0200 schrieb Michal Terepeta:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Christiaan Baaij
>> <christiaan.baaij@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Actually, I meant only with -fno-specialise.
>>
>> Done. Helps quite a bit but CallArity is still a pretty expensive.
>
> I’m on that, and I think I have a quite neat fix for it. I’ll report on
> that in the trac ticket:
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10293#comment:4
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
> mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
> Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users