+1
On 05/03/2012 11:06, AntC wrote:
Gershom Bazerman<gershomb<at> gmail.com> writes:
... If everyone finds this agreeable (and I can
imagine no reason they wouldn't!) ...
That's a misleading remark: you're asking people to agree to a half-baked and
sketchy proposal.
I wonder if we might all stop and take a deep breath at this point. The debate is getting a little more heated than we're used to on this mailing list.
There's lots of great discussion going on, and sadly for myself I think I'm missing a lot of the fine details of the debate because of the volume. So can I ask people to take a little more time when concocting their replies, read it over a couple of times, see if it can't be condensed a bit - and above all, let's be civilized. This is Haskell, and we're proud of our community.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users