Umm, then it wouldn&#39;t be lite!  Most of the libs in Haskell platform aren&#39;t needed in the server context.  Ghc + builtin libs/bind + cabal-install is what I really mean.  :-)<span></span><br><br>On Sunday, February 23, 2014, harry &lt;<a href="mailto:voldermort@hotmail.com">voldermort@hotmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Carter Schonwald wrote<br>
&gt; Let&#39;s not get off track :-).  I&#39;m pretty sure some folks occasionally need<br>
&gt; to do profiling/perf debugging on a live server.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; So you support there being some easy way to get ghc and cabal-install<br>
&gt; together or no? (Heroku is a good example I guess)<br>
<br>
If the only difference between the proposed platform-lite and the regular<br>
bindist is the inclusion of cabal-install, which will be separately<br>
downloadable anyway, then it doesn&#39;t seem worth the bother. I&#39;d be more<br>
interested in a slimmed-down bindist for those who need it.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/RFC-include-a-cabal-install-executable-in-future-GHC-releases-tp5742543p5744511.html" target="_blank">http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/RFC-include-a-cabal-install-executable-in-future-GHC-releases-tp5742543p5744511.html</a><br>

Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, &#39;cvml&#39;, &#39;Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org&#39;)">Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users</a><br>
</blockquote>