That would be great.
On 18 October 2011 13:49, bob zhang <bobzhang1988@gmail.com> wrote:Yes I would allow this to pass.
> In my contrived example the definition of class C is like this
> class C c where { foo :: c Int => ....}
> class C B => B a where { ...}
> will this pass under your proposal?
If this would be enough to support what you want to do I'm happy to
make the change.
Max