Links

SO: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/210835/what-is-referential-transparency

Reddit discussions of said SO question.

http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/x8rr6/uday_reddy_on_referential_transparency_and_fp/

http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/xgq27/uday_reddy_sharpens_up_referential_transparency/

This was a fascinating exchange and I'm glad to be reminded to revisit it :).


On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Kim-Ee Yeoh <ky3@atamo.com> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Henning Thielemann
<lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
> Can someone enlighten me about the origin of the term "referential
> transparency"? I can lookup the definition of "referential transparency" in
> the functional programming sense in the Haskell Wiki and I can lookup the
> meaning of "reference" and "transparency" in a dictionary, but I don't know
> why these words were chosen as name for this defined property.

Instead of a immaculately precise definition, may I suggest going
about it from the practical benefits POV? RT matters so much in
Haskell because of the engineering leverage it gives us. Bird's Pearls
are a good source of Why Equational Reasoning Matters.

-- Kim-Ee

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe