On 6/18/07, Andrew Coppin <andrewcoppin@btinternet.com> wrote:
Creighton Hogg wrote:
>
>
> On 6/18/07, *Andrew Coppin* <andrewcoppin@btinternet.com
> <mailto:andrewcoppin@btinternet.com
>> wrote:
>
> That reminds me... Somebody should write an *OS* in Haskell! :-D
>
>
> Well, there hasn't been a lot of work done on the subject but you
> probably should look at
> http://programatica.cs.pdx.edu/House/
> Now if you're seriously asking how one would do it, the basic approach
> taken in the paper was to create a monad H that was a controlled
> subset of IO & that did all the fundamental interactions with the the
> hardware. The operations of H, as with IO, have to be primitives in
> the runtime that you're using and probably written in C or assembly.
I read about House once. It seemed too far-out to be true.
OTOH, it's only a proof-of-concept system. I doubt it will ever become a
real, usable system, sadly.
Well if no one works on it, that's kind of a given. :-P
But more seriously, what seems so far out about it? I'm curious.
Also, if this thread of operating systems & functional programming isn't interesting to other people then we should probably just take it to e-mail & not the list.