Sorry, i meant ghci not cabal.
As for hsdev, in order to provide its features it will have to
load and keep track of entire project information which is
already done by ghc-mod and hdevtools separately. So you
ushould see how much effort is wasted on doing the same thing
again and again in each of 4 different tools (ghci, ghc-mod,
hdevtools and hsdev)
On Monday, March 10, 2014 12:32:25 PM UTC-7, Niklas Hambüchen
wrote:
On
10/03/14 18:41, Vagif Verdi wrote:
> This is an excellent illustration of how fragmentation in
this specific
> area hurts community. Not only you are forced to use 3
different tools
> (ghc-mod, hdevtools, cabal) each of which basically
provides the same
> service but in an incompatible and incomplete way. But
you decided to
> create yet another one instead of contributing to the
ones you already
> use (they are all open source)
I'm not sure what you mean to say; ghc-mod and cabal certainly
do not do
the same. Hsdev doesn't either, and claiming that we don't
contribute to
these projects is strange.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskel...@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe