Is this a mistake in the release candidate announcement? It pretty clearly states:

"""
This release will feature,
  ...

  * Overloaded record fields
"""
Thanks!
-deech 

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM, aditya siram <aditya.siram@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm trying out the GHC 8.2.1 release candidate [1], added 'OverloadedRecordFields' and I get an error saying it's an 'Unsupported Extension'. Am I doing something wrong?

This is not in 8.2, it may be in 8.4.

(The Status page is confusing: it has a header for it, but the text says: "...but no OverloadedRecordFields extension or...". Perhaps the header should be changed to "Progress on overloaded record fields"?)

--
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net