Idris> :doc map
Prelude.Functor.map : Functor f => (m : a -> b) -> f a -> f b
Apply a function across everything of type 'a' in a
parameterised type
The function is Total
Idris> :doc length
Prelude.List.length : List a -> Nat
Compute the length of a list.
Runs in linear time
The function is Total
Prelude.Strings.length : String -> Nat
Returns the length of the string.
> length ""
0
> length "ABC"
3
The function is Total
I like the flag idea mentioned by Eric Seidel:> Perhaps instead of changing the default behavior of :type or adding newcommands, we could add a flag to enhance :type's output.Would it be overkill to have two flags, one that enabled showing the full type + specializations, and a "newbie mode" flag that only showed a few specializations?Daniel.
On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 2:34:29 PM UTC+2, Takenobu Tani wrote:Dear cafe,I'm forwarding mail from ghc-devs ML [1].I think `:type` command is very important for beginners and middle users.Please feedback your opinion to them ;)> 2016-04-26 22:08 GMT+09:00 Richard Eisenberg <e...@cis.upenn.edu>:> Hi devs,>> Over the weekend, I was pondering the Haskell course I will be teaching next year and shuddered at having to teach Foldable at the same time as `length`. So I implemented feature request #10963 (https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10963), which allows for a way for a user to request a specialization of a type. It all works wonderfully, but there is a real user-facing design issue here around the default behavior of :type and whether or not to add new :type-y like commands. I have outlined the situation here: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Design/GHCi/Type>> I'd love some broad input on this issue. If you've got a stake in how this all works, please skim that wiki page and comment on #10963.>> Thanks!> RichardCheers,Takenobu
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe