On , Ryan Ingram <ryani.spam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sam. 狢 don't know much about the performance problems you are
> seeing, but I think your solution is more cleanly implemented just
> under the event level with futures.
>
> I think the reactive function you want has a type like this:
>
> stateMachine :: s -> (a -> s -> s) -> (s -> Future (b, s)) -> Event a -> Event b
>

Hi Ryan.

I will have to study futures, and your code, for a while before I can give an intelligent response,
but I really appreciate the suggestion. I will have a look at futures next.

Many thanks,
Sam