Hi Kashyap
I am not sure if this solution to your problem but try using Bytestring rather than String in 

parseXML' :: String -> XMLAST


parseXML' str =
  f ast where


      ast = parse (spaces >> xmlParser) "" str


      f (Right x) = x

      f (Left x) = CouldNotParse


Also see this post[1] My Space is Leaking..

Regards,
Mukesh Tiwari

[1] http://www.mega-nerd.com/erikd/Blog/


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:11 AM, C K Kashyap <ckkashyap@gmail.com> wrote:
Oops...I sent out the earlier message accidentally.

I got some profiling done and got this pdf generated. I see unhealthy growths in my XML parser.
I must be not using parsec efficiently.

Regards,
Kashyap




On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, C K Kashyap <ckkashyap@gmail.com> wrote:
I got some profiling done and got this pdf generated. I see unhealthy growths in my XML parser.



On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:12 PM, C K Kashyap <ckkashyap@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi folks,

I've run into more issues with my report generation tool .... I'd really appreciate some help.

I've created a repro project on github to demonstrate the problem.

There is a template xml file that needs to be replicated several times (3000 or so) under the data directory and then "driver" needs to be run. The memory used by driver keeps growing until it runs out of memory.

Also, I'd appreciate some tips on how to go about debugging this situation. I am on the windows platform.


Regards,
Kashyap


On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Kim-Ee Yeoh <ky3@atamo.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Konstantin Litvinenko
<to.darkangel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. You (and Dan) are totally right. 'Let' just bind expression, not
> evaluating it. Dan's evaluate trick force rnf to run before hClose. As I
> said - it's tricky part especially for newbie like me :)

To place this in perspective, one only needs to descend one or two
more layers before the semantics starts confusing even experts.

Whereas the difference between seq and evaluate shouldn't be too hard
to grasp, that between evaluate and (return $!) is considerably more
subtle, as Edward Yang notified us 10 days ago. See the thread titled
To seq or not to seq.

-- Kim-Ee

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe




_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe