On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:17, Paolo G. Giarrusso <p.giarrusso@gmail.com> wrote:
First, thanks to you and everybody for the alternative. But I'm still
convinced that the syntax is supposed to work, and you're just
workarounding the bug.

Hm, I think we have differing expectations; the syntax everyone presented is the one that is normally used for such things in ghci, and while perhaps the one you tried is supposed to work, it's a bit unusual and therefore probably not very well tested.