> Doesn't that go through Eiffel first or something strange?
Not at run-time. I think Daan leveraged the Eiffel bindings in automatically generating part of the Haskell bindings.
> I admit I haven't tried it personally, but I'm told getting wxHaskell to
> build is a tad tricky, and the code hasn't been maintained in a long
> time. (Isn't Fooey based on it?)
I think wxHaskell is somewhat maintained but could definitely use more attention. I was delighted to hear recently from Daan that he intends to pick up maintenance again. It really is tastefully designed, as imperative interfaces go.
I also heard from Duncan that he intends to work on giving gtk2hs a more elegant layering.
Phooey, GuiTV, and Eros are all built on wxHaskell. (See Haskell wiki pages.) Sean Seefried's Pan implementation is also, and uses OpenGL.
Cheers, - Conal
Radosław Grzanka wrote:
> 2007/11/21, Conal Elliott <conal@conal.net>:
>
>> I've just started using OpenGL with wxHaskell, which is my favorite of the
>> Haskell GUI toolkits. (I like elegant interfaces.) So far, so good. If
>> anyone else is using that combination, I'd love to hear about it.
>>
>
> There are bindings for wxWidgets for Haskell? Bring it on! Is there
> any GUI building application like Glade for Gtk?
>
Doesn't that go through Eiffel first or something strange?
I admit I haven't tried it personally, but I'm told getting wxHaskell to
build is a tad tricky, and the code hasn't been maintained in a long
time. (Isn't Fooey based on it?)