On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas@gmail.com> wrote:

On 4 April 2011 22:42, Jason Dagit <dagitj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this something people would be interested in having as an extension in
> GHC? Or is it just too fluffy for anyone to really care?

I wish for having ⊥ available as 'undefined' without needing to write
it between parenthesis (currently it is interpreted as an operator).

Slightly harder to locate on the keyboard, but that would be nice!

Jason