On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Thiago Negri <evohunz@gmail.com> wrote:(Disclaimer: I can't speak for Cloud Haskell's developers.)
> My view of Cloud Haskell usage would be something similar to this: a
> master node sending work to slaves; slave instances getting up or down
> based on demand. So, the master node should be slave-failure-proof and
> also find new slaves somehow.
>
> Am I misunderstanding the big picture of Cloud Haskell or doing
> anything wrong in the following code?
AFAIK this is CH's goal. However, they're not quite there yet. Their
network implementation is still a lot naive as you're seeing =).
Cheers,
--
Felipe.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe