Perhaps this is similar to what you&#39;re looking for.<br><br><a href="http://openquark.org/Open_Quark/Welcome.html">http://openquark.org/Open_Quark/Welcome.html</a><br><br>It&#39;s a pure, lazy language for the JVM.  I haven&#39;t used it myself, but I would imagine that <br>
it would have a Java FFI.<br><br>Cheers,<br> - Tim<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Tony Morris <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tonymorris@gmail.com">tonymorris@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">I have hypothesised a pure, lazy language on the JVM and perhaps the<br>
.NET CLR with FFI to .NET/Java libraries. I foresee various problems but<br>
none that are catastrophic; just often requiring a compromises,<br>
sometimes very unattractive compromises. I have authored several<br>
libraries in the same vain as pure, lazy programming to run on the JVM<br>
in Java and Scala programming languages.<br>
<br>
I expect others have forethought and perhaps even experimented with such<br>
a language. Are there any dangers to be wary of that undo the entire<br>
endeavour?<br>
<br>
Thanks for any insights.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Tony Morris<br>
<a href="http://tmorris.net/" target="_blank">http://tmorris.net/</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>