On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Felipe Lessa <felipe.lessa@gmail.com> wrote:

Hmmm... but, assuming a preprocessor, you probably would be able
to transform this code:
 
[snip] 
 
The only part missing here is being able to run only a small part
of the arrow's computation and then return another Action.
 
Is my example contrived?  Am I missing something? :)

Assuming a sufficiently smart preprocessor you can do anything you'd like, but the result isn't an arrow. ;)

-Edward Kmett