On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Dougal Stanton <ithika@gmail.com> wrote:

> (+>) seems to imply to me that the operator is non-associative. Something
> like (<>) or (<+>) would be better.

It's too similar to the applicative (*>), and implies all sorts of
things like different types of the two arguments and so on.

If you have comments like the above, please add them to the Trac ticket. Speaking for myself, I'll be happiest to give weight to comments that suggest alternative operators.

Thanks,
Bryan.