It is actually confirmed that GHCJS will go into an official GHC release? I have not been able to find that information on the GHC tracker.
I have tried GHCJS, Haste and the UHC-JS in the past and found Haste the most easy to install and use. As far as I know, GHCJS and Haste are the only compilers to support all GHC extensions.
Of course, this actualizes that old question of whether pervasive use of GHC-only extensions is A Good Thing... yet still I keep finding {-# LANGUAGE DeriveTraversable, ViewPatterns, TypeFamilies … #-} on top of my source files.
Regards,
Hans
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com>wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:32 PM, ?mer Sinan A?acan <omeragacan@gmail.com>wrote:
I'm aware of this, but when I first tried it a few months ago, it was
not easy to use at all. Is it changed now?
The biggest bump in usability will come from it not being just in HEAD
with everything about building it that that implies. (next release of GHC
will have it)
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine
associates
allbery.b@gmail.com
ballbery@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad
http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe