it looks like ghc itself is under a BSD3 style license, if thats any help.
Thanks Magnus.I guess it means that the license of individual packages is what that matters.The platform on the whole does not have any single license.In other words, I cannot just say that am using haskell platform but that I have to say, I am using x,y and z libraries which in turn are using a, b, c and d libraries.
> A quick search suggests that ..:Ouch! Apologies. Guess I was looking at all the wrong places or my google-fu is embarrassingly bad.Thanks again for the links!Hemanth K--
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Magnus Therning <magnus@therning.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Sai Hemanth K <saihemanth@gmail.com> wrote:A quick search suggests that this still hasn't been decided:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am trying to use haskell for building a tool (in a commercial setting). I
> am trying to figure out what all licenses are involved here.
> Is there a single license for the entire haskell platform (and the runtime)
> or is it that I need to look at the individual licenses of all the
> libraries and tools that make up the platform and point to them separately?
>
> The wikipedia page on haskell platform [0] says Haskell Platform is BSD
> licensed. But I do not find any such info elsewhere.
> Any pointers on this would be greatly appreciated,
http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform/ticket/85
http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform/wiki/AddingPackages#Interimlicensepolicy
I believe it still holds that all packages included in
haskell-platform are BSD3 licensed.
/M
--
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
email: magnus@therning.org jabber: magnus@therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
I drink I am thunk.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe