I meant that as a top-level syntactic thing, to avoid writing "import CSS" in the let/where blocks, for multiple top-level definitions that use the same import.

Just premature bikeshed :-)

On 06/08/2015 12:15 AM, "Oliver Charles" <ollie@ocharles.org.uk> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:12 PM Moritz Kiefer <moritz.kiefer@gmail.com> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 5. August 2015 14:59:54 UTC+2 schrieb Mike Ledger:
This would be really handy to have. You could also have import "blocks", like

import Foo in {
  ...
}

Where {...} is a new layout block, I guess.
 Is let not exactly this block feature?

Indeed, in my post I use let bindings to achieve this:

let import CSS in [ width (px 50) ]

You could also add other local bindings to your scope:

let import CSS 
    sizeInPx = px 50
in [ width sizePx, height sizeInPx ]

(Note that just like let the other bindings have access to the symbols that were imported)

ocharles 

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe