For those interested, the version of data-clist without Empty is here:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://github.com/sw17ch/data-clist/tree/noEmpty">http://github.com/sw17ch/data-clist/tree/noEmpty</a></div><div><br></div>
<div><a href="http://github.com/sw17ch/data-clist/tree/noEmpty"></a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Luke Palmer <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:lrpalmer@gmail.com">lrpalmer@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Maciej Piechotka &lt;<a href="mailto:uzytkownik2@gmail.com">uzytkownik2@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>

&gt; However then we lost the monoid (ok. I haven&#39;t send patch but please<br>
&gt; accept[1]) along with alternative/monad plus - which is much more<br>
&gt; popular, standard and useful then Copointed/Comonad.<br>
<br>
</div>This point is a self-fulfilling prophecy.  We don&#39;t have very much<br>
experience working with copointeds and comonads, but I don&#39;t think<br>
that makes them useless, just unfamiliar.<br>
<br>
&quot;One must never confuse what is natural with what is habitual.&quot;  --<br>
Mahatma Gandhi<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Luke<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>