Not that I really want to encourage such a "stringly typed" practice, but it wouldn't really be that much of a stretch.

* Use haskell-src-exts[0] and haskell-src-meta[1] to make a quasiquoter that can parse Haskell syntax
* Use syb[2] or some other generics to find VarE and ConE expressions.  In order to use SYB with TH, you'll want th-orphans[3]
* Use 'reify'[4] on the name of the variable or constructor, to see if it exists.  If it doesn't[5], replace it with (LitE (StringL (nameBase name)))

Shouldn't really be much code at all! :D

-Michael

[0] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/haskell-src-exts
[1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/haskell-src-meta
[2] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/syb
[3] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/th-orphans
[4] http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/template-haskell/latest/doc/html/Language-Haskell-TH.html#v:reify
[5] http://byorgey.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/idempotent-template-haskell/


On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu@fuuzetsu.co.uk> wrote:
On 01/09/13 07:02, yi lu wrote:
> I want to know if it is possible that I use strings without "".
>
> If I type
> *Prelude>foo bar*
> which actually I mean
> *Prelude>foo "bar"*
> However I don't want to type ""s.
>
> I have noticed if *bar* is predefined or it is a number, it can be used as
> arguments. But can other strings be used this way? Like in bash, we can use
> *ping 127.0.0.1* where *127.0.0.1* is an argument.
>
> If not, can *foo* be defined as a function so that it recognize arguments
> like *bar* as *"bar"*?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yi Lu
>
>
You can't do this non-trivially. I think your only bet would be Template
Haskell using the second approach and even then, it's a huge, huge
stretch. I highly recommend against such ideas though. Do you really
want anything that's not bound to be treated as a String? (The answer is
‘no’). I suggest that you get used to ‘"’s.

If you have deep hatred for ‘"’, you could resort to spelling out the
strings like ['f', 'o', 'o'] or even 'f':'o':'o':[].

It's a bit like asking whether you can do addition everywhere by just
typing the numbers to each other (no cheating and defining number
literals as functions ;) ).

--
Mateusz K.

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe