That's good to hear, Chris!Can I suggest to include a version of this explanation in the README?Maybe you could also suggest that people post their questions on SOusing the haskell-lucid tag:Cheers!SimonAm Mi., 10. Juni 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb chris done>> Hi Simon,>> I am still maintaining and actively using the package. Architecture-wise, nothing substantial has changed in the 6 years since its release. Just small additions. This package pretty much maintains itself. PRs come and go.>> In fact, any kind of overhauls or user-facing design changes at this stage would cause disruption and I would encourage that to be achieved in a separate package with a new name. In review, I'm very happy with Lucid's design and plan to maintain it long-term into the future for as long as HTML is relevant.>> However, I am providing no Q&A or "tech support". Having an issue tracker would say otherwise.>> Oleg is also a maintainer.>> Cheers,>> Chris>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, at 5:27 AM, Simon Jakobi wrote:>> Hi!>> I recently noticed that the issue tracker for the lucid package at>>> has been disabled. Does this have any implications for the future> maintenance of the package? Is anyone still committed to maintaining> the package?>> (I've CC'd Oleg who made the most recent commit to the repo.)>> The context for my question is that we'd like to use lucid for the> Dhall documentation generator that is being developed as a part of> this year's GSoC.>> Thanks!> Simon>>