Id be surprised if there's not a way to encode a union like structure using hlist. 

On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Ben Foppa <benjamin.foppa@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, I wasn't aware of vinyl and compdata. I'll check them out.
I'm not very familiar with HList, but I was under the impression that it provided intersection, not union, i.e. for every type in { x1 x2 ..}, an HList has an element vs for SOME type  in {x1 x2 ..} a Union has an element..


On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald@gmail.com> wrote:
There's also compdata 


On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Ben Foppa <benjamin.foppa@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi cafe. On a use case whim, I made the open-union package (https://github.com/RobotGymnast/open-union), copying the basic idea from extensible-effects:Data.OpenUnion1. I haven't uploaded to hackage yet, on the chance that there's already something like this around. Here's the basic functionality:
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
import Data.OpenUnion

type MyUnion = Union (Char :| Int :| [()] :| Void)

showMyUnion :: MyUnion -> String
showMyUnion
    =  (\(c :: Char) -> "char: " ++ show c)
    @> (\(i :: Int) -> "int: " ++ show i)
    @> (\(l :: [()]) -> "list length: " ++ show (length l))
    @> typesExhausted

main :: IO ()
main = do
    putStrLn $ showMyUnion $ liftUnion (4 :: Int)
    putStrLn $ showMyUnion $ liftUnion 'a'
    putStrLn $ showMyUnion $ liftUnion [(), ()]

If any of the (@>) cases is omitted, a compile-time error occurs. If you try to lift a bad value to the union, a compile-time error occurs.

Any thoughts? Is there already something like this around?