The caller of your function f, rather than the implementation of f, gets to decide which instance of A f should return. In other words, f's implementation must be polymorphic in its return type. Your example f x = x does not satisfy that property. That implementation has type f :: A a => a -> a, not the required type f :: (A a, A b) => a -> b.

The error message is saying that, from the class definition, GHC has deduced that f must return a value of type A b => b, but your implementation is returning a String (a.k.a. [Char]) instead. The notation b ~ [Char] means "b is equivalent to [Char]".

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Larry Lee <llee454@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi

I have a very simple problem.
I have a class and want to define a function in that class that returns a different instance of the same class.

I tried accomplishing this as follows:

    class A a where
      f :: A b => a -> b


This fails however when I try to instantiate it. For example:

    instance A String where
      f x = x


I get an error message that makes absolutely no sense to me:

    src/CSVTree.hs:12:9:
        Could not deduce (b ~ [Char])
        from the context (A b)
          bound by the type signature for f :: A b => String -> b
          at src/CSVTree.hs:12:3-9
          `b' is a rigid type variable bound by
              the type signature for f :: A b => String -> b
              at src/CSVTree.hs:12:3
        In the expression: x
        In an equation for `f': f x = x
        In the instance declaration for `A String'
    make: *** [compile] Error 1

Can someone please explain: how I can achieve my goal; and why my code is failing; simply and in plain English.

Thanks,
Larry
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe