I recently experimented with that kinda stuff. See the following:

type family SelectPrivilege a :: Bool
type instance SelectPrivilege ReadTransaction  = True
type instance SelectPrivilege WriteTransaction = True

type family UpdatePrivilege a :: Bool
type instance UpdatePrivilege ReadTransaction  = False
type instance UpdatePrivilege WriteTransaction = True

data Read
data Write

data Transaction t r

executeUpdateTransaction :: UpdatePrivilege t ~ True => Transaction t r -> IO r
executeUpdateTransaction =
  undefined
​

The above code ensures that transactions of type Transaction Read r cannot be executed using the executeUpdateTransaction function. However then the same type level logic can be encoded using an existence of a type class instance:

class SelectPrivilege t
instance SelectPrivilege ReadTransaction
instance SelectPrivilege WriteTransaction

class UpdatePrivilege t
instance UpdatePrivilege WriteTransaction

data Read
data Write

data Transaction t r

executeUpdateTransaction :: UpdatePrivilege t => Transaction t r -> IO r
executeUpdateTransaction =
  undefined

2014-10-16 14:58 GMT+04:00 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljenovic@gmail.com>:
Using the Constraint type and the ConstraintKinds extension, is there
any way we can determine if a Constraint is satisfied (i.e. a
type-level function of type Constraint -> Bool using DataKinds)?

--
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com
http://IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe