_0 : _1 : _1 : _2 : _2 : _2 : _0 : []
One could just use `_` if there is only one arg:_ + _ (which mean what Kim thought it would mean)
and use:_0 + _1 (for the case you wanted to support)Cheers
I just want to add that I find the syntax extremely confusing and counter intuitive.I thought it was just me, or that I was missed something. But it looks like I'm not the only one.On 7 April 2014 21:58, Kim-Ee Yeoh <ky3@atamo.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:02 PM, ducis <ducis_cn@126.com> wrote:
It lets your write lambdas with 'slots' without inventing names for the parameters.[s| ı + ı |] = \x y -> x+yI have no background in this 'slot lambda' and a search reveals this package as the only hit.Which may explain why I find the example given confusing. Why would [s| 1+1 |] not be equivalent to \x->x+x ?
-- Kim-Ee_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
--Alois Cochard