Am 20.08.2016 um 20:33 schrieb Brandon Allbery:
> You might want to look at cpphs as an alternative preprocessor. There are
> some ancient K&R-era hacks that could be used if absolutely necessary, but
> cpphs should be a much simpler and cleaner solution.

Is there any reason /not/ to prefer cpphs over cpp? If not, why does
anyone still use cpp for Haskell?