Well that was a quick response. I think it&#39;s silly the idea that someone would cast more votes than one on an election for this, but I can&#39;t trust a poll where someone can continually click yes or no over and over. I like your idea.<br>

<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Michael Snoyman <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:michael@snoyman.com">michael@snoyman.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

I noticed the recent thread about mascots, and trying to get accurate<br>
polling information. Don&#39;t consider this email to say I think we need<br>
safeguards against a poll on mascots (are people *really* trying to<br>
rig the election on this???), but I thought this might be a good<br>
features for Haskellers.com. Since we already have the &quot;verified<br>
account&quot; issue, we could use that to break down polls. More<br>
specifically, anyone would be allowed to vote, and then you could<br>
review results for verified users only, all logged in users, or<br>
theoretically even not-logged-in users (not sure how I feel about this<br>
one).<br>
<br>
If people would use this feature, I think I can add it next week.<br>
<br>
Michael<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Heath Matlock<br>+1 256 274 4225<br>