Yes, you're the last to learn about it; we were all wondering when you would figure it out. ;-)

It's definitely "folklore", I can't remember where I first learned about it.  I agree with Tom that it's surprising (but nice) that it works even with data types that were not declared using record syntax.  I also always find it surprising that record update or matching binds more tightly than function application, so that no parentheses are needed.  Sometimes I feel like it would actually look nicer to write 

f (A1 {}) = ...

but then hlint yells at me.  (Yes, I'm aware I can turn off individual hlint warnings. =)

-Brent

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 7:47 AM Noon van der Silk <noonsilk@gmail.com> wrote:
Sometimes I have a type like:

    data A = A1 Int | A2 Int Int

Then if I want to do pattern matching and ignore the parameters I do:

    f (A1 _) = ..
    f (A2 _ _) = ...

But that's annoying; I need to remember how many parameters each one has!

Yesterday I learned I can just do this:

    f A1 {} = ...
    f A2 {} = ...

And GHC is happy.

Is this expected? Am I the last to learn about this trick?

--
Noon van der Silk, ن

http://silky.github.io/

"My programming language is kindness."
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.