Could it be so that you can shortcut in the expected order (left to right)?

Left associative:
a && b && c = (a && b) && c which means going into a && b, which means going into a, and if it is False, then going up in the expression tree.

If it is right associative:
a && b && c = a && (b && c), which means going into a, and if it is False, you are done.

If you have a conjunction of n booleans, the complexity of evaluating this expression is linear with respect to the position of the first False (in the case of &&). In the left-associative case, it is linear in the number of &&s.

Just a guess. But you got me interested now.

Does anyone have the real explanation?

Cheers,

Ivan

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 22:13, Richard Eisenberg <rae@richarde.dev> wrote:
Hi café,

Why are && and || in the Prelude right-associative? This contradicts my expectation and the way these work in other languages. That said, I can't think of any harm in it. This came up from a question asked by a student, and I have no idea why the design is this way.

Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.