Thanks Stephen,<br>I&#39;ll look at the Parsec documentation ... I&#39;d certainly be interested in the article. But I thought Parsec was conceptually same as Parselib ... is that not the case?<br>Regards,<br>Kashyap<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Richard O&#39;Keefe <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:ok@cs.otago.ac.nz">ok@cs.otago.ac.nz</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On Jun 2, 2010, at 6:45 AM, Stephen Tetley wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
There&#39;s a C parser for Happy (LR) - I long while ago I converted this<br>
to Frown (also LR) - both Happy and Frown are parser generators that<br>
take a grammar description and generate a Haskell module that<br>
implements the Parser. Personally I prefer Frown, I find the input<br>
syntax a bit nicer than Happy but unfortunately Frown has disappeared<br>
since its author Ralf Hinze moved to Oxford.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
It hasn&#39;t _entirely_ disappeared.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/frown/0.6.1-6" target="_blank">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/frown/0.6.1-6</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Regards,<br>Kashyap<br>