Heh, I&#39;m interested in both, but I&#39;m feeling like I needed a new project, and I thought this might make a good one =)<div><br clear="all">Louis Wasserman<br><a href="mailto:wasserman.louis@gmail.com">wasserman.louis@gmail.com</a><br>

<a href="http://profiles.google.com/wasserman.louis">http://profiles.google.com/wasserman.louis</a><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Don Stewart <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:dons@galois.com">dons@galois.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

chrisdone:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">&gt; On 4 June 2010 00:05, Don Stewart &lt;<a href="mailto:dons@galois.com">dons@galois.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; wasserman.louis:<br>
&gt; &gt;&gt; What, if anything, stands in the way of parallelizing Cabal installs, make -j<br>
&gt; &gt;&gt; style?<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Parallelizing ghc --make<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt;    <a href="http://vimeo.com/6572966" target="_blank">http://vimeo.com/6572966</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Unless Louis meant what&#39;s stopping cabal-install from installing<br>
&gt; dependancies in parallel instead of serial? In which case; nothing?<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
</div></div>Oh, sorry, dependencies (package level parallelism) vs modules (ghc --make level parallelism)<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-- don<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>