On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma@ro-che.info> wrote:

  runST $ ...

Such a rule wasn't added for (.), presumably because people write runST . f much
less often, and there weren't as many complaints (perhaps any at all) about (.)
not working with runST.

That, and because they kept trying to fix the real problem (and missing, a lot). A search of the archives will find various Simons grumping about getting it to work right.

--

brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates

allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net

unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe