On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:16 AM, david48 <dav.vire+haskell@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:08 PM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:

> So you're saying it should be better documented in Haskell what a Monoid is.
>  Did you say you searched for "C++ class" why not "Haskell Monoid" then?
>  The first correct google hit that didn't think I meant Monads, takes you
> straight to the GHC documentation for Data.Monoid.

Read my first post on the thread, that's exactly what I did ( and then
complained that the doc for Data.Monoid was close to useless )

Sorry missed it!  This is an exceptionally long thread! :-)  I agree Data.Monoid's docs don't give you much to work with.