On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Tom Davie <tom.davie@gmail.com> wrote:IIRC, that doesn't satisfy the associativity law, particularly when
> Of note, there is a sensible monad instance for zip lists which I *think*
> agrees with the Applicative one, I don't know why they're not monads:
> instance Monad (ZipList a) where
> return = Ziplist . return
> join (ZipList []) = ZipList []
> join (ZipList (a:as)) = zlHead a `zlCons` join (map zlTail as)
you are joining a list of lists of different lengths. 2 minutes of
experimenting failed to find me the counterexample though.