Hi,
Unfortunately while this compiles it does not work correctly. For example the code:
data D1
data D2
class Dispatch a b where
type Impl_ a b :: *
runF :: a -> b -> Impl_ a b
instance (Show a, Impl_ D1 D2 ~ (a -> IO ())) => Dispatch D1 D2 where
runF _ _ = print
compiles with the warning:
No explicit associated type or default declaration for ‘Impl_’
In the instance declaration for ‘Dispatch D1 D2’
But however when I run it I see that the type function does not resolve:
*Main> runF (undefined :: D1) (undefined :: D2)
<interactive>:8:1:
Couldn't match expected type ‘a0 -> IO ()’
with actual type ‘Impl_ D1 D2’
The type variable ‘a0’ is ambiguous
In the first argument of ‘print’, namely ‘it’
In a stmt of an interactive GHCi command: print it
Thanks!
-deechOn Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 8:59 AM, aditya siram <aditya.siram@gmail.com> wrote:Hi,
That seemed to compile! I had no idea this kind of construction was even possible!
However it did spew out a bunch of warnings like:
"No explicit associated type or default declaration for ‘Impl’ in instance ..."
Thanks!
-deechOn Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Erik Hesselink <hesselink@gmail.com> wrote:Could you do something like this?
instance (Impl D1 D2 ~ a -> IO (), C a) => Dispatch D1 D2
Erik
> _______________________________________________
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 7:59 PM, aditya siram <aditya.siram@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'd like to be able to constrain an associated type.
>
> I used to have an instance that looked like:
> class Dispatch a b c | a b -> c where
> runF :: a -> b -> c
> instance (C a) => Dispatch D1 D2 ( a -> IO ()) where
> runF d1 d2 = (\_ -> return ())
>
> Since I upgraded to 7.8 from 7.5 that instance declaration is no longer
> accepted is no longer accepted since it violates FD's.
>
> I have been updating my code to use type families like so:
> class Dispatch a b where
> type Impl a b :: *
> runF :: a -> b -> Impl a b
> instance (C a) => Dispatch D1 D2 where
> type Impl D1 D2 = a -> IO ()
> runF d1 d2 = (\_ return ())
>
> Unfortunately the `type Impl ...` line in the instance is rejected because
> it uses `a` on the RHS.
>
> In this one case I could just package it up into a newtype or something but
> I would ideally like to be able to constrain any number of arguments like:
> instance (C a, C b ... C z) => Dispatch D1 D2 where
> type Impl D1 D2 = a -> b -> ... -> z -> IO ()
> ...
>
> This was something I could do in 7.6 (although I realize this is way safer).
> How do I go about getting that constraint back?
>
> Thanks!
> -deech
>
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>