Yes, but compilation might be damn slow.<br>I forget about the SheevaPlugs (ARMv5 Kirkwood 1,2 GHz)! They are kind of cheap for what they offer, it&#39;s a very nice embedded platform.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/9/28 Karel Gardas <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:karel.gardas@centrum.cz">karel.gardas@centrum.cz</a>&gt;</span><br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On 09/28/11 11:06 AM, Yves Parès wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This means not only kernel should be the same (w.r.t. its<br>
</blockquote>
API/functionality) but also standard libc and other runtime libraries.<br>
<br>
Yes, this is what I understood. I wasn&#39;t talking about portable *binaries*,<br>
just about the ARM platforms which were efficient enough to run GHC.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Ah, then ARMv5 with 128MB RAM might be sufficient enough for simple Haskell app compiled by GHC. I do have ARMv5 with 32MB RAM (good&#39;n&#39;old NSLU2) but have not tested anything on it yet...<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
Karel<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>