Haskellians,<br><br>Once you have a polymorphic let, why do you need &#39;let&#39; in the base language, at all? Is it possible to formulate Haskell entirely with do-notation where there is a standard monad for let environments? Probably this was all discussed before in the design deliberations for the language standard. Pointers would be very much appreciated.
<br><br>Best wishes,<br><br>--greg<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>L.G. Meredith<br>Managing Partner<br>Biosimilarity LLC<br>505 N 72nd St<br>Seattle, WA 98103<br><br>+1 206.650.3740<br><br><a href="http://biosimilarity.blogspot.com">
http://biosimilarity.blogspot.com</a>