Don't forget that some languages use <> to mean "different" (as if "different" meant always "superior or inferior"...), so some beginners might get confused.

I personally often define the alias:

(<+>) = mappend

2011/7/24 Maciej Wos <maciej.wos@gmail.com>

Personally, I have nothing against mempty (although I agree that mid makes more sense), but I don't like mappend at all. I wonder what happened to the idea of using <> instead of mappend (that's what I always do). I think

a <> b <> c

looks so much better than

a `mappend` b `mappend` c

and it solves the name problem altogether.

-- Maciej

On Jul 24, 2011 3:42 AM, "KC" <kc1956@gmail.com> wrote:

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe