In a custom prelude, I have written the following definitions:
data Truth = True | False
ifThenElse :: Truth -> a -> a -> a
ifThenElse True x _ = x
ifThenElse False _ x = x
(==) :: a -> a -> Truth
(==) = ...
I'm replacing Bool with my own Truth type. Clients will be built with RebindableSyntax, so that they will use these definitions for desugaring.
However, if I write this:
f :: Text -> Text
f "r" = "rrr"
f other = other
I get a build error indicating that GHC expected the (==) operator to return a value of type Bool, rather than Truth.
Shouldn't pattern matching desugar to use overloaded ifThenElse in these situations? Or is it expected that use of GHC.Types.Bool is hard-coded even with RebindableSyntax enabled?
Thanks,
Chris